|Are Scanned Documents Legally Accepted?|
In the United States, two uniform laws clearly establish the basis for admitting records maintained on document imaging systems into evidence:
The Uniform Photographic Copies of Business and Public Records as Evidence Act (UPA) (US 1128-0020-00) - Enacted by almost all states, it specifies that reproductions of records have the same legal significance as the original and may be used in place of the original for all purposes including evidence.
The Uniform Rules of Evidence (US 128-0060-00 to 0170-00) - The other major uniform law, "The Uniform Rules of Evidence", has been adopted by the United States federal courts and 34 states. The Rules of Evidence allow a duplicate to be admissible in evidence "to the same extent as an original" and defines a duplicate as a counterpart produced by any technique "which accurately reproduces the original".
Both laws admit duplicate records into evidence if they accurately reproduce the original because document imaging technology is a duplication technology similar to photocopies, microfilm and facsimile.
The most widely-used reproduction techniques, including photocopy, microfilm, facsimile and document imaging all exhibit the same characteristics:
A document imaging system is similar to other reproduction technologies in that a document imaging system utilizes an electronic scanner for image recognition; computer software, memory and optical disk storage for image manipulation and graphic terminals and laser printers to make the image visible.
If properly done, courts have upheld that imaging and scanning are just as legally binding as paper documents. Legal acceptability of document images depends on the operation or the business process used to create the documents. Audit trails are recommend and are used to prove that a transaction was properly processed by the organization. With Audit Trail, you can instantly know every time an electronic document has been viewed or manipulated. Audit trails help insure document integrity and prove that the image is a true representation of the original - reducing exposure to risk.
Government agencies in the United States may also use document imaging systems to manage and retrieve information. Original short-term paper records could be destroyed after the images have accurately been preserved in a document imaging system. Since document imaging records are not archival, long-term (retention over 10 years) or permanent records must generally be maintained in either paper or archival microfilm form. It is not expected that state and federal archives will permit the destruction of long-term paper records after scanning into a document imaging system, even when document imaging are certified for archival purposes.